| dc.description |
Agriculture is an important sector in developing countries serving most people in rural
areas as their main means of livelihood. About 84% of agriculture activities in Tanzania
are done by smallholder farmers. Cotton is an important cash crop for many countries in
the world. In Tanzania cotton is a major cash crop in the western cotton growing area,
which includes Mwanza, Shinyanga, Mara, Simiyu, Geita, Tabora and Singida regions.
The cotton subsector is known to involve expensive activities to be undertaken compared
to other crops. Farmers in cotton farming areas are characterized by having limited access
to inputs like fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides due to widespread poverty among them.
For smallholder farmers to get profit from cotton production, efficiency in allocating their
resources is crucial. The objective of this study was to assess whether cotton producers in
Chato District get profit from cotton production and whether they produce at the minimum
cost. A multistage sampling procedure was employed to select 150 respondents (134 males
headed households and 16 female headed households) from Chato District. Descriptive
statistics, net profit analysis and a Cobb Douglas stochastic frontier model were computed.
The mean net profit realized was 454 422 TZS/ha. The minimum and maximum net farm
income was -530 938 and 2 399 775 TZS/ha respectively. The results from quartiles range
show that majority of famers are getting profit but the level of profit is different where
others are getting lower profit or negative return. The return on investment was 0.86
shillings for every shilling invested. The study established that, all coefficients in the
frontier model (quantity of cotton harvested, seed, pesticides, fertilizer, land rent and
transport costs) have a positive sign indicating that as inputs, they have a positive
influence on the total production cost. The results show further that, the mean cost
efficiency of smallholder farmers in the study area was 2.9, the minimum cost efficiency
observed being 1 and the maximum was 6.4. The inefficiency model revealed that, cost efficiency among farmers was positively influenced by farmers’ education level, access to
extension services, family size and membership in cotton growing associations. |
|