COSTECH Integrated Repository

Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the midlands province of Zimbabwe

Show simple item record

dc.creator Chivizhe, Joseph, B.
dc.creator Mugabe, Francis, T.
dc.creator Kadigi, Reuben,M.J.
dc.date 2022-08-04T10:57:38Z
dc.date 2022-08-04T10:57:38Z
dc.date 2018-12
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:50:54Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:50:54Z
dc.identifier http://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/4362
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/90777
dc.description Guj. Journal of ex. Edu. Vol. 29 : Issue 2
dc.description Zimbabwe developed smallholder irrigated agriculture initially as a famine relief strategy and later towards alleviation of poverty, employment creation and cushioning the country’s semi arid periodic droughts since the beginning of the twentieth century. The study evaluated the effect of smallholder irrigated agriculture on income distribution. A multistage sampling technique was used to select the two study areas of Ngondoma and HamaMavhaire comprising 71and 56 sample respondents respectively. A researcher administered questionnaire for collection of cross-sectional data. HamaMavhaire results show negative disaggregated income (USD 335.38) for the bottom quintile with the top quintile earning 64.07% of total income. Ngondoma results show earnings of 2.94%, and 58.7% of the income earned by the bottom and top quintiles respectively. The finding shows a Gini coefficient of 0.624 for HamaMavhaire and 0.516 for Ngondoma indicating greater income inequality in HamaMavhaire. Disaggregation of total income using the coefficient of variation and the Gini coefficient shows crop income and transfers being consistently inequality reducing sources, while self employment was inequality increasing. Livestock and non-farm income behaved differently being inequality reducing sources under the Gini coefficient and inequality increasing under the Coefficient of variation. However literature recommends Coefficient of variation than Gini coefficient as more meaningful measure.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Gujarat Journal of Extension Education
dc.subject smallholder irrigation
dc.subject Income inequality
dc.subject Gini coefficient
dc.subject Coefficient of variation
dc.subject Inequality increasing
dc.title Income inequality among the smallholder irrigation farmers: the case of Hamamavhaire and Ngondoma irrigation schemes in the midlands province of Zimbabwe
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
6_Chivizhe_inco ... ication gujaratjournal.pdf 1.308Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account