COSTECH Integrated Repository

Comparison of productivity, cost and energy expenditure when sawing on pitsawing and portable platforms In agroforestry farms in Kilimanjaro

Show simple item record

dc.creator Rurangwa, Felix Anvers
dc.date 2015-02-03T08:29:11Z
dc.date 2015-02-03T08:29:11Z
dc.date 2011
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:51:04Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:51:04Z
dc.identifier Rurangwa,F.A(2011)Comparison Of Productivity, Cost And Energy Expenditure When Sawing On Pitsawing And Portable Platforms In Agroforestry Farms In Kilimanjaro .Morogoro;Sokoine University of Agriculture
dc.identifier https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/374
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/90970
dc.description Although future increase in timber supply in many countries is expected to come from agroforestry, the problem of on farm timber sawing, physical strain on sawyers caused by “Pitsawing” has to be addressed, to increase timber sawing productivity. This study was aimed at analyzing the productivity and energy expenditure by sawyers when using Traditional Pitsawing Platforms (PSP) and Portable Steel Log Sawing Platforms (PLSP) in agroforestry farms in Kiruweni and Nduweni villages in South Kilimanjaro. Pitsawing productivity data was obtained using time studies of the pitsawing operations on the respective platforms and data on energy expenditure was obtained through heart rate measurements using heart rate monitor. Results indicated that the site preparation production rate, using PSP, was 0.1m 3 /h and the structure assembling production rate, using PLSP, was 2.9m 3 /h. The skidding production rate, using PSP, was 3.5m 3 /h and the production rate, using PLSP, was 11.9m 3 /h. Loading productivity improved from 4.97m 3 /h, using PSP, to 7.27m 3 /h, using PLSP. Productivity of sawing work element improved from 0.055m 3 /h, using PSP, to 0.057m 3 /h, using PLSP. In sawing, Energy Expenditure (EE) was 12.69kJ/min and 12.4 kJ/min using PSP and PLSP respectively. During pit excavation/structure assembling, EE was 14.05kJ/min, using PSP, and 2.61kJ/min using PLSP. The physical workload was classified as unduly heavy for PSP and light for PLSP. For the skidding work element, the EE decreased from 5.88kJ/min, using PLSP to 4.48kJ/min, using PSP. For the loading work element, the EE was decreased from 5.20kJ/min, using PSP to 3.55kJ/min, using PLSP. The sawing cost was TAS 205 320/m 3 , using PSP and TAS165 350/m 3 , using PLSP. In conclusion, PLSP is a technically more appropriate technology for reducing EE and sawing costs as well as increasing productivity during timber harvesting in agroforestry farms.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Sokoine University of Agriculture
dc.subject Productivity
dc.subject Energy Expenditure
dc.subject Agroforestry
dc.subject Kilimanjaro
dc.title Comparison of productivity, cost and energy expenditure when sawing on pitsawing and portable platforms In agroforestry farms in Kilimanjaro
dc.type Thesis


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
FELIX ANVERS RURANGWA 2011.pdf 953.1Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account