| dc.description |
Market liberalization in Tanzania has eroded the monopoly of the cooperative
unions by allowing private coffee buyers (PCBs) to compete with them on equal footing.
Similarly, farmers groups and primary societies are now allowed to sell coffee at auction.
Thus, farmers have various options for selling their coffee. Similarly, the coffee industry has
experienced large fluctuations in prices and stagnation in production. How do farmers react to
these changes? Can and do farmers profit from different market conditions and sell to different
traders at the lower end of the value chain, or do they remain with cooperatives or farmers
groups? This study was conducted in Mruwia and Mshiri villages in Moshi Rural district.
Whereas Mshiri village remains attached to the Kilimanjaro Native Cooperative Union
(KNCU), Mruwia has detached from this organization and sells coffee independently. The
sample (103) was randomly selected from the coffee farmers in the two villages. Data were
collected through surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), and socio-anthropological methods
(participant-observation, biographies, and thematic interviews). Results indicate that the selection
of whom to sell coffee depends largely on farmers’ dependence on coffee and prices, other
benefits accrued, and whether the initial costs are covered by buyers. Additionally, most respondents
did not sell coffee to PCBs. Thus, prices, the institutional infrastructure, and the structure
of local communities were important when making decisions about how and with whom to trade. |
|