COSTECH Integrated Repository

Evaluation of plant and animal products / by products as alternative protein sources to fish meal in Tilapia diets

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bazili, Joseph
dc.date 2016-06-28T16:02:20Z
dc.date 2016-06-28T16:02:20Z
dc.date 2015
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:52:15Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:52:15Z
dc.identifier https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/783
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/92354
dc.description Masters Thesis
dc.description The study was conducted to develop practical diets in Tanzania for Nile tilapia using fish meal (FM), soybean meal (SBM), cotton seed meal (CSM), sunflower seed meal (SFSM), freshwater shrimp meal (FSM) and blood meal (BM). Eleven isonitrogenous (30g 100g-1), isolipidic (10g 100g-1) and isoenergetic (18 kJg-1) test diets were prepared; the control diet (FM) used FM (22%) and SBM (30%) as the major sources of protein. In the test diets, FM was fixed at 5%, while inclusion of SBM, CSM and SFSM varied as follows; SBM diets contained SBM at 20(SBM20), 25(SBM25) and 30(SBM30). CSM diets contained CSM at 15(CSM15), 20(CSM20) and 25(CSM25) and SFSM diets contained SFSM at 10(SFSM10), 15(SFSM15) and 20(SFSM20). Blended diet (BLEND) contained CSM and SFSM at 10% and SBM at 5%. Chemical composition was determined using standard method (AOAC, 2002). A total of 330 fingerlings with an average weight of 3.5 g were stocked at rate of 10 fish per 20 L tank. Dietary treatments were in triplicates in complete randomized design. Fish were fed for eight weeks and once a week were weighed and ration adjusted accordingly. Collected data was analysed using descriptive statistics and one way ANOVA at p<0.05. SBM, CSM, SFSM, FSM and BM had 42.3/44.6/19.5/59.1/83.1% of CP and 11.9/14.4/35.5/7.0/0.20% of CF respectively. There was no significant difference in growth between FM and CSM diets (p<0.05). Higher growth was observed in CSM diets and least in SFSM diets. Optimum growth for each ingredient was observed at CSM20, SBM25 and SFSM20. Feed utilization followed the same trend. SFSM, BLEND and CSM diets were cost-effective than FM and SBM diets (p<0.05). Long-term feeding trials using the BLEND, CSM20, SBM25 and SFSM20 diets should be done to evaluate their biological and economical performance under actual farming conditions.
dc.description Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology (COSTECH)
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Sokoine University of Agriculture
dc.subject Plant products
dc.subject Animal products
dc.subject Alternative protein sources
dc.subject Protein sources
dc.subject Fish meal
dc.subject Tilapia
dc.title Evaluation of plant and animal products / by products as alternative protein sources to fish meal in Tilapia diets
dc.type Thesis


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
JOSEPH BAZILI.pdf 2.616Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account