COSTECH Integrated Repository

Circulating Brucella species in wild animals of the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.creator Sambu, R. M
dc.creator Mathew, C
dc.creator Nonga, H. E
dc.creator Lukambagire, A. S
dc.creator Yapi, R. B
dc.creator Akoko, J
dc.creator Fokou, G
dc.creator Keyyu, J. D
dc.creator Bonfoh, B
dc.creator Kazwala, R. R
dc.date 2022-06-10T10:29:36Z
dc.date 2022-06-10T10:29:36Z
dc.date 2021
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:52:56Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:52:56Z
dc.identifier https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/4250
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/93183
dc.description Journal Article
dc.description Background: Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonosis of public health and economic importance worldwide. It affects a number of domestic animals, wild animals and humans. Human brucellosis originates from either livestock or wildlife. The species of Brucella circulating in wild animals in Tanzania is largely unknown due to insufficient surveillance. This study was carried out to identify Brucella species found in selected wildlife hosts in the Serengeti ecosystem. Methodology: The study used a total of 189 archived samples that were obtained from cross-sectional studies previously conducted between 2000 and 2017 in the Serengeti ecosystem in Tanzania. Whole blood, serum and amniotic fluid collected from buffalos, lions, wildebeest, impala, zebra and hyena were available for DNA extraction. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. ovis and B. suis (AMOS PCR) and quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) targeting the bcsp31 and IS711 genes for Brucella genus detection and the IS711 targets alkB for B. abortus and BMEI1162 for B. melitensis were used to detect Brucella strains. Results: Out of the 189 samples tested, 12 (6.35 %) and 22 (11.6 %) were positive to AMOS-PCR and qPCR, respectively. Most of the positive samples were from lions (52.6 %) and buffaloes (19.6 %). Other animals that were positive included: wildebeest (13.6 %), impala (13.6 %), zebra (4.5 %) and hyena (4.5 %). Out of 22 positive samples, 16 (66.7 %) were identified as B. abortus and the other six samples did not amplify for neither B. abortus nor B. melitensis. Conclusions: The detection of Brucella DNA in archived wild animal samples shows testing potential of samples collected from this population. The zoonotic species B. abortus and B. melitensis detected in wild animals have previously been reported in livestock and humans in the region. The findings suggest that, due to the contact network, some of the identified wild animal hosts in this study could be reservoirs for infections in domestic animals and humans within the Serengeti ecosystem while others are likely dead-end hosts. One Health control strategies and continuous surveillance programs in other wildlife reserved areas should be implemented to help predicting transmission in livestock and humans in the region.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer
dc.subject Brucellosis
dc.subject Serengeti ecosystem
dc.subject Wildlife
dc.subject Zoonosis
dc.subject One Health
dc.title Circulating Brucella species in wild animals of the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Paper 11.pdf 1.051Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account