COSTECH Integrated Repository

Evaluation of a variable rate controller for aldicarb application around buffer zones in citrus groves

Show simple item record

dc.creator Tumbo, S. D.
dc.creator Miller, W. M.
dc.creator Salyani, M.
dc.creator Sweeb, R.
dc.creator Buchanon, S.
dc.date 2017-06-23T04:31:05Z
dc.date 2017-06-23T04:31:05Z
dc.date 2007-01-25
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:53:42Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:53:42Z
dc.identifier 0168-1699
dc.identifier https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/1666
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/94047
dc.description Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2007; 56:147–160
dc.description Advances in precision farming technologies have facilitated controlled application of agrochemicals and documentation procedures to follow environmental regulations. This paper details evaluation of a commercial variable rate (VR) controller for preventing aldicarb applications in the buffer zones around potablewater wells of citrus groves. The controllerwas coupled to two common drive mechanisms, a ground-driven electric clutch-engaged (GDEC) and pulse-width-modulation motor-driven (PWMM). The evaluation involved determination of dynamic performance of the VR application system through quantification of reaction times and rate transition distances and determination of appropriate “look-ahead” times for each of the drive mechanisms. Without a look-ahead (zero) setting, the mean midpoint reaction distances were about 1.8 and 3.6m for the GDEC and PWMM mechanisms, respectively, at 7.0-km/h ground speed. For the GDEC, a look-ahead time of 1 s gave the mean midpoint reaction distances of −0.06 and 0.04m during step-up and step-down of the rate, respectively. For PWMM, the best look-ahead times were 1 and 2 s during step-up and step-down of the rate, respectively.However, since the prototype unit could not accommodate two look-ahead times, the compromise look-ahead time for both step-up and -down was 2 s. Validation in the actual buffer zone showed that, at 95% confidence level, the buffer zone should be increased by 2.5 or 3.3m in commercial applications using GDEC or PWMM systems, respectively.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.subject Granular applicator
dc.subject Variable rate application
dc.subject Controller
dc.subject Prescription map
dc.title Evaluation of a variable rate controller for aldicarb application around buffer zones in citrus groves
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
TUMBO 11.pdf 1.571Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account