COSTECH Integrated Repository

Risk Factors for Human Brucellosis in Northern Tanzania.

Show simple item record

dc.creator Cash-Goldwasser, S.
dc.creator Maze, M. J.
dc.creator Rubach, M. P.
dc.creator Biggs, H. M.
dc.creator Stoddard, R. A.
dc.creator Sharples, K. J.
dc.creator Halliday, J. E. B.
dc.creator Cleaveland, S.
dc.creator Shand, M. C.
dc.creator Mmbaga, B. T.
dc.creator Muiruri, C.
dc.creator Saganda, W.
dc.creator Lwezaula, B. F.
dc.creator Kazwala, R. R.
dc.creator Maro, V. P.
dc.creator Crump, J. A.
dc.date 2018-06-14T06:45:12Z
dc.date 2018-06-14T06:45:12Z
dc.date 2018
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T08:53:57Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T08:53:57Z
dc.identifier 0002-9637
dc.identifier https://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/handle/123456789/2358
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/94342
dc.description The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Vol. 98, Issue 2
dc.description Little is known about the epidemiology of human brucellosis in sub-Saharan Africa. This hampers prevention and control efforts at the individual and population levels. To evaluate risk factors for brucellosis in northern Tanzania, we conducted a study of patients presenting with fever to two hospitals in Moshi, Tanzania. Serum taken at enrollment and at 4-6 week follow-up was tested by Brucella microagglutination test. Among participants with a clinically compatible illness, confirmed brucellosis cases were defined as having a ≥ 4-fold rise in agglutination titer between paired sera or a blood culture positive for Brucella spp., and probable brucellosis cases were defined as having a single reciprocal titer ≥ 160. Controls had reciprocal titers < 20 in paired sera. We collected demographic and clinical information and administered a risk factor questionnaire. Of 562 participants in the analysis, 50 (8.9%) had confirmed or probable brucellosis. Multivariable analysis showed that risk factors for brucellosis included assisting goat or sheep births (Odds ratio [OR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 24.6) and having contact with cattle (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0, 1.4). Consuming boiled or pasteurized dairy products was protective against brucellosis (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02, 0.93). No participants received a clinical diagnosis of brucellosis from their healthcare providers. The under-recognition of brucellosis by healthcare workers could be addressed with clinician education and better access to brucellosis diagnostic tests. Interventions focused on protecting livestock keepers, especially those who assist goat or sheep births, are needed.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
dc.subject Brucellosis.
dc.subject Tanzania.
dc.subject Northern Tanzania.
dc.subject Risk.
dc.subject Epidemiology.
dc.subject Sub-Saharan Africa.
dc.title Risk Factors for Human Brucellosis in Northern Tanzania.
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Risk Factors fo ... s in Northern Tanzania.pdf 864.7Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account