COSTECH Integrated Repository

Multiple ecosystem services from field margin vegetation for ecological sustainability in agriculture: scientific evidence and knowledge gaps.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor
dc.creator Mkenda, Prisila
dc.creator Ndakidemi, Patrick
dc.creator Mbega, Ernest
dc.creator Stevenson, Philip
dc.creator Arnold, Sarah
dc.creator Gurr, Geoff
dc.creator Belmain, Steven
dc.date 2020-02-25T06:25:48Z
dc.date 2020-02-25T06:25:48Z
dc.date 2019-11-28
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T09:20:34Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T09:20:34Z
dc.identifier 31799074
dc.identifier https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8091
dc.identifier http://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/123456789/574
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/95049
dc.description This research article published by PubMed, 2019
dc.description Background Field margin and non-crop vegetation in agricultural systems are potential ecosystem services providers because they offer semi-natural habitats for both below and above ground animal groups such as soil organisms, small mammals, birds and arthropods that are service supplying units. They are considered as a target area for enhancing farm biodiversity. Methodology To explore the multiple potential benefits of these semi-natural habitats and to identify research trends and knowledge gaps globally, a review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 235 publications from the year 2000 to 2016 in the Scopus and Web of Science databases were reviewed. Results The literature showed an increasing trend in the number of published articles over time with European studies leading in the proportion of studies conducted, followed by North America, Asia, South America, Africa and Australia. Several functional groups of organisms were studied from field margin and non-crop vegetation around agricultural lands including natural enemies (37%), insect pests (22%), birds (17%), pollinators (16%), soil macro fauna (4%) and small mammals (4%). Ecosystem services derived from the field margin included natural pest regulation, pollination, nutrient cycling and reduced offsite erosion. Some field margin plants were reported to host detrimental crop pests, a major ecosystem dis-service, potentially leading to increased pest infestation in the field. Conclusion The majority of studies revealed the importance of field margin and non-crop vegetation around arable fields in enhancing ecosystem biodiversity. Promotion of field margin plants that selectively enhance the population of beneficial organisms would support sustainable food security rather than simply boosting plant diversity. Our analyses also highlight that agro-ecological studies remain largely overlooked in some regions. 
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher PubMed
dc.subject Agro-ecological intensification
dc.subject Biodiversity
dc.subject Biological control
dc.subject Insect–plant interactions
dc.subject Predation
dc.subject Sustainable agriculture
dc.title Multiple ecosystem services from field margin vegetation for ecological sustainability in agriculture: scientific evidence and knowledge gaps.
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
JA_LiSBE_2019 .pdf 7.989Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account