COSTECH Integrated Repository

Where does land use matter most? Contrasting land use effects on river quality at different spatial scales

Show simple item record

dc.creator Mwaijengo, Grite Nelson
dc.creator Msigwa, Anna
dc.creator Njau, Karoli
dc.creator Brendonck, Luc
dc.creator Vanschoenwinkel, Bram
dc.date 2021-05-21T12:44:00Z
dc.date 2021-05-21T12:44:00Z
dc.date 2020-05-01
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-25T09:24:37Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-25T09:24:37Z
dc.identifier https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134825
dc.identifier http://dspace.nm-aist.ac.tz/handle/20.500.12479/1183
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/95617
dc.description This research article published by Elsevier B.V., 2020
dc.description Understanding the influence of land-use activities on river quality has been a key focus of river monitoring programs worldwide. However, defining which land-use spatial scale is relevant remains elusive. In this study, therefore, we contrasted the influence of land use on river quality using three types of land-use estimators, namely circular buffers around a monitoring site, circular buffers upstream of the monitoring site and the entire watershed area upstream of the monitoring site. The land-use percentage compositions within the Usa-Kikuletwa River catchment in northeastern Tanzania were quantified using Landsat-8 satellite images with a maximum mapping resolution of 30 m. Redundancy analysis models and generalized linear models were used to evaluate the influence of land use on macroinvertebrate assemblages and physico-chemical water quality at different spatial scales in the dry and wet seasons. Overall, a substantial fraction of variation in physico-chemical water quality, macroinvertebrate taxon richness, Chao-1 and TARISS (Tanzania River Scoring System) score could be explained by land use of the entire watershed area upstream of the monitoring site in the dry and wet seasons. However, macroinvertebrate abundances showed strong links with more local land-use patterns within 100 m and 2 km radii. Circular buffers upstream of monitoring sites were more informative for macroinvertebrate assemblages than circular buffers around the monitoring sites. However, the latter did correlate well with physico-chemical water quality variables. Land-use variables correlated across spatial scales (i.e., 100 m up to 2 km radii), but not with the land use in the entire watershed area above the monitoring site. Our results indicate that physico-chemical water quality variables and macroinvertebrates may respond differently to land-uses at different scales. More importantly, our results illustrate that the choice regarding spatial land-use metrics can bias conclusions of environmental impact studies in river systems.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language en
dc.publisher Elsevier B.V.
dc.subject Circular buffers
dc.subject Spatial scale
dc.subject Macroinvertebrates
dc.subject Water quality
dc.subject Watershed
dc.title Where does land use matter most? Contrasting land use effects on river quality at different spatial scales
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
JA_MEWES_2020.pdf 30.81Kb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account