| dc.creator |
Eshton, Bilha |
|
| dc.creator |
Katima, Jamidu H. Y |
|
| dc.date |
2016-05-27T08:21:03Z |
|
| dc.date |
2016-05-27T08:21:03Z |
|
| dc.date |
2015 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2018-03-27T08:41:03Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2018-03-27T08:41:03Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
Eshton, B. and Katima, J.H., 2015. Carbon footprints of production and use of liquid biofuels in Tanzania. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, pp.672-680. |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/2279 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.040 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/2279 |
|
| dc.description |
Full text can be accessed at
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136403211400865X |
|
| dc.description |
Tanzania being a prospective producer and exporter of liquid biofuels, information on local contribution of this sector to the environmental burden of the country is highly required in order to ensure sustainable liquid biofuels. Therefore, this paper evaluates a life cycle carbon footprint (or greenhouse (GHG) gas emissions) of liquid biofuels (biodiesel produced from jatropha oil and bioethanol produced from sugarcane molasses as alternative to fossil fuels in Tanzania. The functional unit (FU) of the study is defined as 1 Giga Joule (GJ) of output energy when a biofuel is combusted in the engine. The study found a positive GHG emissions related to biofuels. A carbon footprint (in CO2 equivalents) of jatropha biodiesel is 23.9 kg FU−1 while that of molasses bioethanol is 17.4 kg FU−1. Biodiesel combustion found to be a major contributor to carbon footprint by 41% which is attributed to methanol used during transesterification of jatropha oil followed by the use of chemical fertilizers (31%). Sugarcane production phase on the other hand found to be the highest contributor to carbon footprint of molasses bioethanol accounting for more than 80%. This is due to the use of diesel fuel, chemical fertilizers and burning of sugarcane prior to harvesting. Sensitivity analysis indicates that higher market prices of molasses increases carbon footprint of bioethanol same as higher market price of biodiesel. For the same energy output of 1 GJ, molasses bioethanol observed to have lower carbon footprint than jatropha biodiesel by 27.2%. Both biofuels observed to save GHG emissions by >70% when used as fossil fuel replacement. The study recommends further research on socio-economic implication of large scale biofuel production; impact of land use change and land use competition and sustainability of biofuels to be carried out in near future. |
|
| dc.language |
en |
|
| dc.subject |
Biodiesel |
|
| dc.subject |
Bioethanol |
|
| dc.subject |
Greenhouse gas emissions |
|
| dc.title |
Carbon Footprints of Production and Use of Liquid Biofuels in Tanzania |
|
| dc.type |
Journal Article |
|