COSTECH Integrated Repository

Mechanical Excavation and Drilling and Blasting – A Comparison Using Discrete Event Simulation

Show simple item record

dc.creator Skawina, Bartłomiej
dc.creator Greberg, Jenny
dc.creator Salama, Abubakary Juma
dc.creator Schunnesson, Håkan
dc.date 2016-07-12T13:31:54Z
dc.date 2016-07-12T13:31:54Z
dc.date 2014
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-27T08:32:43Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-27T08:32:43Z
dc.identifier 978-3-319-02677-0
dc.identifier 978-3-319-02678-7
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/3141
dc.identifier 10.1007/978-3-319-02678-7_36
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/3141
dc.description Full text can be accessed at the following link http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-02678-7_36
dc.description Mine development is often a bottleneck in mining operations and is strongly influenced by the choice of excavation method. In this paper, the two well-recognized methods, conventional drill and blast and mechanical excavation, are compared and discussed. The former method is the continuation of a long tradition in mining, while the latter method started to be used in 1960s, when mechanical excavators such as roadheaders, continuous miners or tunnel boring machines were developed. The rate at which the tunnel advances is one of the most important factors for mine development. By evaluating and selecting the right technique, the speed and effectiveness of the development could be improved. This paper aims to estimate and compare the advancement rate between the mechanical excavator and drill and blast method using simulation with AutoMod. This study has been done for one of Boliden Mineral AB’s mines in Sweden. For the drill and blast method, the study shows increased performance for two simultaneously drilled tunnels when compared with a single one. Furthermore, the simulation runs have estimated the total tunnel development times for the specified development lengths. The study is concluded by sketching an interesting picture of mine development using the mechanical excavator.
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer International Publishing
dc.subject Advancement rate
dc.subject Drill and blast
dc.subject Mechanical excavation
dc.subject AutoMod and discrete event simulation
dc.title Mechanical Excavation and Drilling and Blasting – A Comparison Using Discrete Event Simulation
dc.type Book chapter


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account