COSTECH Integrated Repository

Bats are Not Birds – Different Responses to Human Land-use on a Tropical Mountain

Show simple item record

dc.creator Bonitz, Maria H. B.
dc.creator Ferger, Stefan W.
dc.creator Gaese, Katrin B.
dc.creator Tschapka, Marco
dc.creator Howell, Kim
dc.creator Kalko, Elisabeth K. V.
dc.date 2016-07-19T13:07:37Z
dc.date 2016-07-19T13:07:37Z
dc.date 2015-05
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-03T13:29:45Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-03T13:29:45Z
dc.identifier Helbig‐Bonitz, M., Ferger, S.W., Böhning‐Gaese, K., Tschapka, M., Howell, K. and Kalko, E.K., 2015. Bats are Not Birds–Different Responses to Human Land‐use on a Tropical Mountain. Biotropica, 47(4), pp.497-508.
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/3332
dc.identifier 10.1111/btp.12221
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/3332
dc.description Land-use intensification has consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, with various taxonomic groups differing widely in their sensitivity. As land-use intensification alters habitat structure and resource availability, both factors may contribute to explaining differences in animal species diversity. Within the local animal assemblages the flying vertebrates, bats and birds, provide important and partly complementary ecosystem functions. We tested how bats and birds respond to land-use intensification and compared abundance, species richness, and community composition across a land-use gradient including forest, traditional agroforests (home garden), coffee plantations and grasslands on Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Furthermore, we asked how sensitive different habitat and feeding guilds of bats and birds react to land-use intensification and the associated alterations in vegetation structure and food resource availability. In contrast to our expectations, land-use intensification had no negative effect on species richness and abundance of all birds and bats. However, some habitat and feeding guilds, in particular forest specialist and frugivorous birds, were highly sensitive to land-use intensification. Although the habitat guilds of both, birds and bats, depended on a certain degree of vegetation structure, total bat and bird abundance was mediated primarily by the availability of the respective food resources. Even though the highly structured southern slopes of Mount Kilimanjaro are able to maintain diverse bat and bird assemblages, the sensitivity of avian forest specialists against land-use intensification and the dependence of the bat and bird habitat guilds on a certain vegetation structure demonstrate that conservation plans should place special emphasis on these guilds.
dc.language en
dc.subject Africa
dc.subject Agriculture
dc.subject Biodiversity conservation
dc.subject Community ecology
dc.subject Driving factors
dc.subject Kilimanjaro
dc.subject Landscape management
dc.title Bats are Not Birds – Different Responses to Human Land-use on a Tropical Mountain
dc.type Journal Article, Peer Reviewed


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account