| dc.creator |
Kaswamila, A. L. |
|
| dc.creator |
Mwakipesile, A. E. |
|
| dc.date |
2020-03-13T06:31:38Z |
|
| dc.date |
2020-03-13T06:31:38Z |
|
| dc.date |
2019 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-05-06T13:13:50Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2021-05-06T13:13:50Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
Kaswamila, A. L., & Mwakipesile, A. E. (2019). Resident hunting ban in Serengeti district and Its implications to people’s livelihood and wildlife population. In wildlife population monitoring. IntechOpen. |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/2147 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/2147 |
|
| dc.description |
Open access peer-reviewed chapter. Available at: https://www.intechopen.com/books/wildlife-population-monitoring/resident-hunting-ban-in-serengeti-district-and-its-implications-to-people-s-livelihood-and-wildlife- |
|
| dc.description |
In 2002 Serengeti District Council entered an agreement with Singita Grumeti Reserve Limited to ban resident hunting by compensating the District Council TZS 460 million (USD 200,000) per annum. This study assessed the implications of the ban on communities’ livelihood and wildlife populations in the district. Up to 2011 about TZS 1.7 trillion (USD 727, 000) had been paid to the District Council. Findings reveal that communities were not involved in the decision and that the ban had mixed results on community livelihood. Communities mentioned provision of development infrastructures and students’ scholarship and increase of game species as benefits emanating from the ban. Denial to access game meat, increased destructive wildlife particularly elephants, misallocation of funds by the Council, increased food insecurity, and killings of people by wildlife were perceived as costs. The study concludes that the ban has significantly boosted the Council’s revenues and increased wildlife populations. However, communities have been denied their constitutional rights of hunting and access to cheap source of protein. Further, communities have witnessed increased human-elephant conflict and food insecurity. The study recommends involvement of communities in such major decisions affecting people’s livelihood and the need for research before implementing such a decision. |
|
| dc.language |
en |
|
| dc.publisher |
IntechOpen. |
|
| dc.subject |
Resident hunting |
|
| dc.subject |
Wildlife population |
|
| dc.subject |
People’s livelihood |
|
| dc.subject |
Wildlife monitoring |
|
| dc.subject |
Singita Grumeti reserve |
|
| dc.subject |
Game reserve |
|
| dc.subject |
Serengeti district |
|
| dc.title |
Resident hunting ban in Serengeti district and Its implications to people’s livelihood and Wildlife Population. In wildlife population monitoring |
|