COSTECH Integrated Repository

Defluoridation of drinking water using coalesced and un-coalesced mica

Show simple item record

dc.creator Hussei, Idd Ally
dc.creator Vegi, Maheswara Rao
dc.date 2020-11-24T13:38:53Z
dc.date 2020-11-24T13:38:53Z
dc.date 2020
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-20T13:09:18Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-20T13:09:18Z
dc.identifier Hussein, I. A., & Vegi, M. R. (2020). Defluoridation of drinking water using coalesced and un-coalesced mica. Applied Water Science, 10(2), 64.
dc.identifier DOI:10.1007/s13201-020-1153-z
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/2566
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/2566
dc.description Full text article. Also available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1153-z
dc.description This is a sorption study that focused on the use of mica clay mineral grouped into mica untreated, activated mica at 800 °C, mica impregnated separately with iron and aluminium for defluoridation of water. In this study, characterization of adsorbent was done by using XRF and XRD and quantification of fluoride by using fluoride ion selective electrode. Characterization of adsorbent showed the presence of SiO2, CaO, P2O5, Fe2O3 and Al2O3 in the adsorbent. XRD exhibited higher composition of illite, calcite, quartz and albite. Batch experiments were conducted by using a homogeneous mixture of water having 16 mg/L of fluoride. The removal efficiencies of mica alone, activated mica at 800 °C, mica impregnated with iron and mica impregnated with aluminium were found to be 76.02%, 90.21%, 94.40% and 96.88%, respectively. Activated mica and coalesced mica are better adsorbents than mica alone. The optimized pHs were 7.3, 4.4, 7.5, doses of 10, 9 and 8 g, contact time of 40, 35 and 30 min for activated mica, mica impregnated with iron and mica impregnated with aluminium, respectively. The adsorption process obeyed Freundlich model for mica impregnated with aluminium indicating monolayer mechanism, whereas activated mica and mica impregnated with iron agreed with both Freundlich and Langmuir models indicating both monolayer homogeneous and heterogeneous surface conditions. From the kinetic perspective, the fluoride adsorptive reaction followed the pseudo-second-order model. Therefore, activated and modified mica are alternative adsorbents for defluoridation of water.
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer
dc.subject Mica
dc.subject Adsorbent
dc.subject Defluoridation
dc.subject Fluoride ion selective electrode
dc.subject XRF
dc.subject XRD
dc.subject Mica clay mineral
dc.title Defluoridation of drinking water using coalesced and un-coalesced mica
dc.type Article


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Vegi.pdf 1.094Mb application/pdf View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account