Quantification of modelled 4D response and viability of repeated seismic reservoir monitoring in J-Area Field, Central North Sea

Simple item page
dc.creatorMvile, Benatus Norbert
dc.creatorAbu, Mahamuda
dc.creatorBishoge, Obadia Kyetuza
dc.creatorYousif, Ibrahim Mohamed
dc.creatorKazapoe, Raymond
dc.date2022-03-08T11:32:13Z
dc.date2022-03-08T11:32:13Z
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T13:09:29Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T13:09:29Z
dc.descriptionAbstract. Full text available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43217-020-00037-0
dc.description4D reservoir monitoring has recently become a major tool used to manage the hydrocarbon production of reservoirs. When combined to production well data, high quality 4D seismic is very useful to address production changes in a reservoir over time. This becomes very challenging though, for most of the clastic reservoirs from the J-Area field, in Central North Sea. These reservoirs are frequently compartmentalized with complex faulting which can result in different initial fluid contacts and pressures across the same field. Full understanding of which faults are acting as hydrocarbon baffles or flow barriers would be very useful in optimizing drilling. This work aimed to determine whether 4D seismic techniques could realistically aid this understanding by quantifying the reservoir production effects relating to pore pressure and water saturation changes in J-Area Triassic using real and predicted well data. It further aimed at testing the viability of repeated seismic reservoir monitoring in this field using the normalized root mean square (NRMS) technique. The modelled 4D seismic response derived from synthetic seismic traces based on seismic volumes generated from the well data was used to design a new dedicated 4D survey. The results show that both pore pressure depletion and water saturation changes produce a significant 4D effects in the reservoir. Yet, pore pressure depletion become the major production effect in this field as the majority of 4D effects are due to pore pressure reduction through depletion of the reservoir. The study suggest that, for optimum reservoir monitoring, a baseline survey must be reprocessed in parallel with the monitor survey to reduce the NRMS noise or alternatively a dedicated repeat survey is acquired matching the design of the latest vintage of seismic.
dc.identifierMvile, B. N., Abu, M., Bishoge, O. K., Yousif, I. M., & Kazapoe, R. (2021). Quantification of modelled 4D response and viability of repeated seismic reservoir monitoring in J-Area Field, Central North Sea. Journal of Sedimentary Environments, 6(1).
dc.identifierDOI: 10.1007/s43217-020-00037-0
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/3456
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/3456
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.subjectHydrocarbon
dc.subject4D reservoir
dc.subject4D seismic
dc.subjectReservoir monitoring
dc.subject4D reservoir monitoring
dc.subjectSeismic
dc.titleQuantification of modelled 4D response and viability of repeated seismic reservoir monitoring in J-Area Field, Central North Sea
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Research Articles