Consolidated Holding Corporation..Appe Vs Sackson..Respo CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2010

Simple item page
dc.creatorMsoffe J.A
dc.creatorLuanda J.A
dc.creatorOriyo J.A
dc.date2016-09-15T07:18:54Z
dc.date2016-09-15T07:18:54Z
dc.date2010
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-24T12:19:16Z
dc.date.available2018-03-24T12:19:16Z
dc.descriptionCONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORPORATION(App) Vs 1. SACKSON ANDREW LUHANJO 2. AKIM J. TWEVE 3. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS(Res)
dc.descriptionThis appeal revolves around the interpretation of Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Act (CAP 20 R.E. 2002), (hereinafter the Act) which reads: - 372. TheHigh Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness/ legality or propriety of any finding/ sentence or 2 order recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any subordinate court.
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11192/1715
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11192/1715
dc.languageen
dc.publisherCAT-MBEYA
dc.subjectRevision third parties
dc.titleConsolidated Holding Corporation..Appe Vs Sackson..Respo CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2010
dc.typeOther

Files

Collections

Unreported Cases