Return on Training Investment in Parliaments: The Need for Change in the Pacific Region

dc.creatorKinyondo, Abel
dc.date2018-04-02T15:08:33Z
dc.date2018-04-02T15:08:33Z
dc.date2012
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-11T08:38:46Z
dc.date.available2018-04-11T08:38:46Z
dc.descriptionDespite substantial investment in training in Pacific parliaments, which has continued for more than a decade, parliamentary performance for many countries in the region has barely improved. Indeed, Pacific parliaments are still widely regarded as weak. The inability of training programmes to improve parliamentary performance in several areas of the Pacific led the researcher to query whether training providers are concentrating their resources on the right people. Using a multi-case design that used interviews in five Pacific parliaments—Marshall Islands, Papua New Guinea, Timor-Leste, Tonga and Vanuatu—the author argues that training providers should give priority to parliamentary staff rather than members of parliaments.
dc.identifierKinyondo, A. (2012). “Return on Training Investment in Parliaments: The Need for Change in the Pacific Region”. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(3), pp. 576-592.
dc.identifier0031-2290
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/4660
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/4660
dc.languageen
dc.publisherParliamentary Affairs
dc.relation65;3
dc.titleReturn on Training Investment in Parliaments: The Need for Change in the Pacific Region
dc.typeJournal Article, Peer Reviewed

Files