Dative applicative elements in Arusa (Maa): A canonical approach to the argument-adjunct distinction
| dc.creator | Karani, Michael | |
| dc.date | 2020-02-19T12:27:49Z | |
| dc.date | 2020-02-19T12:27:49Z | |
| dc.date | 2019 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-03T13:06:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-03T13:06:35Z | |
| dc.description | The present paper analyzes the degree of the argumenthood or adjuncthood of elements licensed by the dative applicative (DA) construction in Arusa within a canonical approach to the argument-adjunct distinction. After testing DA elements for the various criteria and diagnostics associated with the typologically-driven prototype of arguments and adjuncts, the authors conclude the following: in most cases, DA elements behave as canonical arguments and are therefore located close to the argumenthood pole of the argument-adjunct continuum. | |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/5386 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.5842/58-0-842 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/5386 | |
| dc.language | en | |
| dc.publisher | Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus | |
| dc.relation | ;Vol. 58 | |
| dc.subject | Maa(sai); arguments; adjuncts; canonical typology; cognitive linguistics. | |
| dc.title | Dative applicative elements in Arusa (Maa): A canonical approach to the argument-adjunct distinction | |
| dc.type | Journal Article, Peer Reviewed |