Essential medicine stock-outs in rural primary health care–exploring the contribution of politics and resulting perceptions in Kasulu district, Tanzania

Simple item page
dc.creatorKessy, Ambrose
dc.creatorBana, Benson
dc.creatorDamian, Respicius Shumbusho
dc.date2020-03-19T09:57:29Z
dc.date2020-03-19T09:57:29Z
dc.date2018
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T12:01:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-20T12:01:02Z
dc.descriptionFull Text Article. Also available at: www.isdsnet.com/ijds
dc.descriptionStock-outs of essential medicines and medical items remains a persistent problem in Tanzania, despite the several policy initiatives and interventions since the 1990s. We conducted a qualitative case study, which involved 24 in-depth interviews and eight focus group discussions with the Community Health Fund stakeholders who were facility incharges, grassroots leaders, and members of Health Facility Governance Committees from eight primary health facilities in Kasulu District Council. The analysis involved transcribing and coding textual data to identify the key themes that emerged. The study identified four main themes that explained how the politics contribute to persistent stock outs, especially: 1) stock-outs as capital in electoral politics; 2) misinformation and rent-seeking; 3) dyads among street-level bureaucrats; and 4) competition and struggle for power and control over resources. We also identified four themes reflecting the dominant perceptions associated with stock-outs in the study communities namely: 1) feeling marginalized; 2) mistrust and suspicion of authority; 3) frustration of health workers; and 4) informal drug sellers as ‘the best'. These perceptions influence the way communities tend to define their role in health care financing and governance as well as the relationship between communities and health workers. While economic, administrative, and technical forces might influence stock outs, the politics within the management and governance of the Community Health Fund, which included rent-seeking, misinformation, and competition, significantly affected the legitimacy of the Community Health Fund. The resulting low enrollment and unwillingness to contribute makes medicines’ financing from community sources unsustainable. Therefore, empowering communities to mobilize locally available resources and exercise autonomous control over financial resources and medicine is imperative for addressing persistent stock outs.
dc.identifierDamian, R. S., Bana, B., & Kessy, A. (2018). Essential medicine stock-outs in rural primary health care–exploring the contribution of politics and resulting perceptions in Kasulu district, Tanzania. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(10), 2486-2513.
dc.identifier2186-8662
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/2209
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12661/2209
dc.languageen
dc.publisherInternational Society for Development and Sustainability (ISDS)
dc.subjectPrimary health care
dc.subjectCommunity Health Fund
dc.subjectCHF
dc.subjectPolitics
dc.subjectTanzania
dc.subjectEssential medicines
dc.subjectCommunity-based insurance schemes
dc.subjectCommunity health
dc.subjectHealth politics
dc.subjectMedicine Stock Outs
dc.titleEssential medicine stock-outs in rural primary health care–exploring the contribution of politics and resulting perceptions in Kasulu district, Tanzania
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

Research Articles