Director Of Public Prosecution..Appli Vs Ahmed..Respo Crim Appli No.2 Of 2013 Hon.Mbarouk,J.A
dc.creator | Mbarouk J.A | |
dc.creator | Abdul J. A | |
dc.date | 2016-06-14T06:38:24Z | |
dc.date | 2016-06-14T06:38:24Z | |
dc.date | 2013 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-24T12:18:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-24T12:18:45Z | |
dc.description | DPP(App) Vs Ahmed Hamis Ahmed | |
dc.description | When the appeal was called on for hearing, the Court suo motu raised a point as to whether it has been properly moved. This is for the reason, that the requirements under Rule 48 (1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009 (the Rules) was violated by the applicant. Rule 48 (1) of the Rules. | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11192/1356 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11192/1356 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.publisher | CAT-ZANZIBAR | |
dc.subject | Rule 48(1) | |
dc.subject | Notice of motion | |
dc.subject | Ahmed Hamis Ahmed | |
dc.title | Director Of Public Prosecution..Appli Vs Ahmed..Respo Crim Appli No.2 Of 2013 Hon.Mbarouk,J.A | |
dc.type | Other |