dc.creator |
Msoffe J.A |
|
dc.creator |
kileo J.A |
|
dc.creator |
Kimaro J.A |
|
dc.date |
2016-07-13T11:59:43Z |
|
dc.date |
2016-07-13T11:59:43Z |
|
dc.date |
2013 |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-03-24T12:18:48Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-03-24T12:18:48Z |
|
dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/11192/1427 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11192/1427 |
|
dc.description |
Hassan Mohamed Ngoya(App)
Vs
Republic(Res) |
|
dc.description |
First and foremost, we wish to paraphrase this judgment by making
one observation. The proceedings of the trial District Court of Kondoa
show that a total number of 14 witnesses testified in the case. Some of
these witnesses were the routine ones i.e. an arresting officer, a witness
who drew a sketch plan of the area of incident, etc. With respect, these
were the sort of witnesses who could have easily been left out without
affecting the quality of the case. |
|
dc.language |
en |
|
dc.publisher |
CAT-DODOMA |
|
dc.subject |
Armed robbery |
|
dc.title |
Hassan Mohamed Mgoya..Appe Vs The Repub..Respo Crim Appe No.134 Of 2012 Hon.Msoffe,J.A |
|
dc.type |
Other |
|