COSTECH Integrated Repository

Loan repayment performance of clients of informal lending institutions Do borrowing histories and dynamic incentives matter?

Show simple item record

dc.creator Mori, Neema
dc.creator Charles, Goodluck
dc.date 2019-02-18T15:25:27Z
dc.date 2019-02-18T15:25:27Z
dc.date 2017-07
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-07T11:55:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-07T11:55:01Z
dc.identifier Goodluck Charles, Neema Mori, (2017) "Loan repayment performance of clients of informal lending institutions: Do borrowing histories and dynamic incentives matter?", International Journal of Development Issues, Vol. 16 Issue: 3, pp.260-275, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDI-04-2017-0039
dc.identifier http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/5071
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/5071
dc.description Purpose – The purpose of this article is to examine the effects that dynamic incentives and the borrowing histories of clients of informal lending institutions have on loan repayment performance, in particular, the extent to which multiple borrowing and progressive lending affect the repayment of loans. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses a data set of 835 borrowers drawn from an informal lending institution in Tanzania. Descriptive analysis and econometric models are used to test the developed hypotheses. Findings – Whereas clients with multiple loans are associated with poor loan repayment, progressive lending contributes to positive repayment outcomes. Multiple borrowers face increased debt levels and thereby an increased inability to meet their repayment obligations; in contrast, progressive lending by building up a lender–client relationship helps clients to obtain higher loans with a minimum amount of screening. Research limitations/implications – This was a cross-sectional study based on a sample of individual clients drawn from a single institution. However, since the majority of clients had also taken out loans with other financial institutions, the sample is considered to be representative. Practical implications – A client’s past repayment performance and multiple loan history must be assessed so that multiple borrowing can be prevented and credit absorption capacity can be gauged more accurately. The repeated nature of the interactions and the threat to cut off any future lending (if loans are not repaid) can be exploited to overcome any information deficit. Originality/value – This study was conducted in a context in which the degree of information sharing was low and institutional access to clients’ credit histories was limited. It contributes knowledge on how lenders minimise the risk flowing from the ex ante information gap and moral hazards arising from the ex post information gap.
dc.publisher Emerald
dc.subject Informal Lending
dc.subject Loan Repayment Performance
dc.subject Multiple Borrowing
dc.subject Progressive Lending
dc.title Loan repayment performance of clients of informal lending institutions Do borrowing histories and dynamic incentives matter?
dc.type Journal Article, Peer Reviewed


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search COSTECH


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account