| dc.creator |
Karani, Michael |
|
| dc.date |
2020-02-19T12:27:49Z |
|
| dc.date |
2020-02-19T12:27:49Z |
|
| dc.date |
2019 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2021-05-03T13:06:35Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2021-05-03T13:06:35Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/5386 |
|
| dc.identifier |
10.5842/58-0-842 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11810/5386 |
|
| dc.description |
The present paper analyzes the degree of the argumenthood or adjuncthood of elements licensed by the dative applicative (DA) construction in Arusa within a canonical approach to the argument-adjunct distinction. After testing DA elements for the various criteria and diagnostics associated with the typologically-driven prototype of arguments and adjuncts, the authors conclude the following: in most cases, DA elements behave as canonical arguments and are therefore located close to the argumenthood pole of the argument-adjunct continuum. |
|
| dc.language |
en |
|
| dc.publisher |
Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus |
|
| dc.relation |
;Vol. 58 |
|
| dc.subject |
Maa(sai); arguments; adjuncts; canonical typology; cognitive linguistics. |
|
| dc.title |
Dative applicative elements in Arusa (Maa): A canonical approach to the argument-adjunct distinction |
|
| dc.type |
Journal Article, Peer Reviewed |
|