CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORPORATION(App) Vs 1. SACKSON ANDREW LUHANJO 2. AKIM J. TWEVE 3. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS(Res)This appeal revolves around the interpretation of Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Act (CAP 20 R.E. 2002), (hereinafter the Act) which reads: - 372. TheHigh Court may call for and examine the record of any criminal proceedings before any subordinate court for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the correctness/ legality or propriety of any finding/ sentence or 2 order recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of any subordinate court.