| dc.creator |
Msoffe J.A |
|
| dc.creator |
Luanda J.A |
|
| dc.creator |
Oriyo J.A |
|
| dc.date |
2016-09-15T07:18:54Z |
|
| dc.date |
2016-09-15T07:18:54Z |
|
| dc.date |
2010 |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2018-03-24T12:19:16Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2018-03-24T12:19:16Z |
|
| dc.identifier |
http://hdl.handle.net/11192/1715 |
|
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/11192/1715 |
|
| dc.description |
CONSOLIDATED HOLDING CORPORATION(App)
Vs
1. SACKSON ANDREW LUHANJO
2. AKIM J. TWEVE
3. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS(Res) |
|
| dc.description |
This appeal revolves around the interpretation of Section 372 of
the Criminal Procedure Act (CAP 20 R.E. 2002), (hereinafter the Act)
which reads: -
372. TheHigh Court may call for and examine
the record of any criminal
proceedings before any subordinate
court for the purpose of satisfying itself
as to the correctness/ legality or
propriety of any finding/ sentence or
2
order recorded or passed, and as to the
regularity of any proceedings of any
subordinate court. |
|
| dc.language |
en |
|
| dc.publisher |
CAT-MBEYA |
|
| dc.subject |
Revision third parties |
|
| dc.title |
Consolidated Holding Corporation..Appe Vs Sackson..Respo CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 126 OF 2010 |
|
| dc.type |
Other |
|